public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, perex@suse.cz
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove unused funcion proc_mknod
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 21:30:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030505213004.B24006@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030505192248.GD10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>; from viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk on Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:22:48PM +0100

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:22:48PM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> manually.  IOW, removal of proc_mknod() won't solve anything.  The
> real question is whether we should allow device nodes on procfs.
> If we should not allow them, ALSA needs API changes.  If we should,
> it'd be better to have creation of such nodes explicit (and if ALSA
> keeps doing that, it should switch to calling proc_mknod()).

We shouldn't.  It's very bad style.  And it seems ALSA also registers a
chardev and devfs entries for that stuff.

Jaroslav, can we just drop that junk or is it still used by userland.
And if yes how long will it take to get an alsa-libs release out to
not rely on it?

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-05 17:00 [PATCH] remove unused funcion proc_mknod Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-05 19:22 ` viro
2003-05-05 19:30   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-05-05 20:45     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-09 11:43     ` Jaroslav Kysela
2003-05-09 11:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-09 11:55         ` Jaroslav Kysela

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030505213004.B24006@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox