public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Michael Hunold <hunold@convergence.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH[[2.5][3-11] update dvb subsystem core
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:49:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030506214918.A18262@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB7DCF0.2070207@convergence.de>; from hunold@convergence.de on Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:04:00PM +0200

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:04:00PM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> this patch updates the dvb subsystem core.
> 
> Fixed problems:
> - partly reintroduced the DVB_DEVFS_ONLY switch, which was previously
> wiped out by Alan Cox: if enabled, some really obscure code is not
> compiled into the kernel that is necessary to xxx

No, this is wrong.  I did remove it not Alan Cox and I removed it because
kernel 2.5/2.6 should not behave differently whether devfs is used or
not except nodes showing up in devfs.

> -	/* fixme: is this correct? */
> -	try_module_get(THIS_MODULE);
> +

Just removing this makes the code even more incorrect.  You need to
add a ->owner member and call try_module_get on it before calling into
the module (and handle the return value..)

> -typedef struct dmxdev_dvr_s {
> +typedef struct dmxdev_dvr {
>          int state;
> -        struct dmxdev_s *dev;
> +        struct dmxdev *dev;
>          dmxdev_buffer_t buffer;
>  } dmxdev_dvr_t;

Once you rename everything you can nuke the typedef crap aswel..


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-06 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-06 16:04 [PATCH[[2.5][3-11] update dvb subsystem core Michael Hunold
2003-05-06 20:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-05-07  9:19   ` Michael Hunold
2003-05-07  9:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07 15:56       ` Michael Hunold
2003-05-07 16:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-06 21:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07  8:40   ` Michael Hunold
2003-05-07  9:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07 15:56       ` Michael Hunold
2003-05-07 15:59         ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07 16:14           ` Michael Hunold
2003-05-07 16:15             ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-07 18:30             ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030506214918.A18262@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hunold@convergence.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox