From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: haveblue@us.ibm.com, akpm@digeo.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The magical mystical changing ethernet interface order
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 07:54:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030508.075438.52189319.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1052405730.10038.51.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: 08 May 2003 15:55:31 +0100
Unfortunately for the ISA driver code we *have* to rely on link
order or rip out the __init stuff and use Space.c type hacks.
I do no argue that needing an invocation order is bogus.
I merely disagree with the way we're trying to achieve it.
You don't need Space.c magic, the linker in binutils has mechanisms by
which this can be accomplished and we already use this in 2.5.x
Have a peek at __define_initcall($NUM,fn), imagine it with one more
argument $PRIO. It might look like this:
#define __define_initcall(level,prio,fn) \
static initcall_t __initcall_##fn __attribute__
((unused,__section__ ("\.initcall" level "." prio ".init"))) = fn
Use the 'prio' number to define the ordering. The default for
modules that don't care about relative ordering within a class
use a value like "9999" or something like that.
The only magic is what to do with the vmlinux.lds scripts to
handle this correctly. Are regular expressions allowed in the
section names?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-08 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-07 13:14 The magical mystical changing ethernet interface order Russell King
2003-05-07 15:18 ` Dick Streefland
2003-05-07 15:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-07 15:24 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-07 17:14 ` Russell King
2003-05-07 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-07 22:28 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-08 12:05 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-08 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-08 14:54 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-05-08 16:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-05-08 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-08 16:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-11 18:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-08 17:56 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-05-08 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-09 6:51 ` Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-08 19:32 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-05-08 21:43 ` Eli Carter
2003-05-08 22:19 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-05-08 21:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-08 23:23 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-08 23:38 Ray Lee
2003-05-09 12:41 ` Dick Streefland
2003-05-09 14:33 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-05-10 7:42 Thomas Hood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030508.075438.52189319.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox