Re: ioctl32_unregister_conversion & modules

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Friday 09 May 2003 17:24, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Fixing that would require resgister_ioctl32_conversion() to have 3-rd
> parameter "this module" and some magic inside fs/compat_ioctl.c,
> right?

The code that is currently using register_ioctl32_conversion() does
not have to be changed if we use 

extern int 
__register_ioctl_conversion(int, ioctl_trans_handler_t, struct module*);

static inline int 
register_ioctl_conversion(int cmd, ioctl_trans_handler_t h)
{
	return __register_ioctl_conversion(cmd, h, THIS_MODULE);
}

/* maybe also: */
static inline int 
register_compatible_ioctl(int cmd)
{
	return __register_ioctl_conversion(cmd, NULL, NULL);
}

register_compatible_ioctl() is not strictly needed, but it will avoid
doing the unnecessary try_module_get() when there is no handler.

	Arnd <><