public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BENCHMARK] 2.5.69-mm3 with contest
@ 2003-05-11  6:55 Con Kolivas
  2003-05-12  7:55 ` Nick Piggin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-05-11  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux kernel mailing list; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Nick Piggin

no_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.68-mm1          2   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.68-mm2          1   80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.68-mm3          1   80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.69              1   80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.69-mm3          1   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
cacherun:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   75      100.0   0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.68-mm1          1   75      100.0   0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.68-mm2          1   76      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.68-mm3          1   76      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.69              1   76      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.69-mm3          1   76      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.96
process_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   181     40.9    193.3   57.5    2.29
2.5.68-mm1          2   178     41.6    191.5   56.7    2.25
2.5.68-mm2          2   177     41.8    177.5   56.5    2.21
2.5.68-mm3          2   177     42.4    181.5   55.9    2.21
2.5.69              2   181     41.4    196.5   58.0    2.26
2.5.69-mm3          2   176     42.0    183.0   56.2    2.23
ctar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   105     74.3    0.0     0.0     1.33
2.5.68-mm1          3   112     69.6    1.0     5.3     1.42
2.5.68-mm2          3   108     73.1    1.0     5.6     1.35
2.5.68-mm3          3   120     66.7    1.0     5.0     1.50
2.5.69              3   103     75.7    0.0     0.0     1.29
2.5.69-mm3          3   126     63.5    1.0     4.8     1.59
xtar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   105     72.4    1.0     3.8     1.33
2.5.68-mm1          3   108     71.3    1.0     4.6     1.37
2.5.68-mm2          3   107     72.0    1.0     4.7     1.34
2.5.68-mm3          3   111     69.4    1.7     4.5     1.39
2.5.69              3   106     72.6    1.0     3.7     1.32
2.5.69-mm3          3   111     69.4    1.7     4.5     1.41
io_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   492     15.9    167.1   19.7    6.23
2.5.68-mm1          4   128     59.4    47.6    19.4    1.62
2.5.68-mm2          4   131     58.8    47.0    18.9    1.64
2.5.68-mm3          4   271     28.4    89.2    17.9    3.39
2.5.69              4   343     22.7    120.5   19.8    4.29
2.5.69-mm3          4   319     24.5    105.3   18.1    4.04
io_other:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   148     52.7    65.7    25.0    1.87
2.5.68-mm1          2   117     66.7    48.9    22.0    1.48
2.5.68-mm2          2   120     65.0    49.2    22.3    1.50
2.5.68-mm3          2   127     61.4    45.1    19.5    1.59
2.5.69              2   127     61.4    55.5    24.4    1.59
2.5.69-mm3          2   133     58.6    47.1    18.7    1.68
read_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   109     71.6    6.2     4.6     1.38
2.5.68-mm1          2   115     68.7    9.1     6.1     1.46
2.5.68-mm2          2   115     67.8    9.1     6.1     1.44
2.5.68-mm3          2   117     67.5    9.2     6.0     1.46
2.5.69              2   104     75.0    6.3     4.8     1.30
2.5.69-mm3          2   113     69.9    9.1     6.1     1.43
list_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   95      81.1    0.0     5.3     1.20
2.5.68-mm1          2   96      79.2    0.0     7.3     1.22
2.5.68-mm2          2   97      79.4    0.0     7.2     1.21
2.5.68-mm3          2   96      80.2    0.0     7.3     1.20
2.5.69              2   95      81.1    0.0     5.3     1.19
2.5.69-mm3          2   95      81.1    0.0     7.4     1.20
mem_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   113     69.0    64.3    1.8     1.43
2.5.68-mm1          2   98      79.6    53.0    2.0     1.24
2.5.68-mm2          2   101     78.2    53.0    2.0     1.26
2.5.68-mm3          2   130     61.5    75.0    2.3     1.62
2.5.69              2   98      79.6    60.5    2.0     1.23
2.5.69-mm3          2   135     59.3    77.0    2.2     1.71
dbench_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.68              3   412     18.4    5.3     47.6    5.22
2.5.68-mm1          4   361     21.1    5.5     54.0    4.57
2.5.68-mm2          4   345     22.0    4.8     49.3    4.31
2.5.68-mm3          4   721     10.5    6.8     33.6    9.01
2.5.69              4   374     20.3    5.0     48.1    4.67
2.5.69-mm3          4   653     11.6    6.2     34.0    8.27

Very similar to 2.5.68-mm3

Con

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.69-mm3 with contest
  2003-05-11  6:55 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.69-mm3 with contest Con Kolivas
@ 2003-05-12  7:55 ` Nick Piggin
  2003-05-12  8:29   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2003-05-12  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list, Andrew Morton



Con Kolivas wrote:

snip

>io_load:
>Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.5.68              3   492     15.9    167.1   19.7    6.23
>2.5.68-mm1          4   128     59.4    47.6    19.4    1.62
>2.5.68-mm2          4   131     58.8    47.0    18.9    1.64
>2.5.68-mm3          4   271     28.4    89.2    17.9    3.39
>2.5.69              4   343     22.7    120.5   19.8    4.29
>2.5.69-mm3          4   319     24.5    105.3   18.1    4.04
>
snip

>
>dbench_load:
>Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>2.5.68              3   412     18.4    5.3     47.6    5.22
>2.5.68-mm1          4   361     21.1    5.5     54.0    4.57
>2.5.68-mm2          4   345     22.0    4.8     49.3    4.31
>2.5.68-mm3          4   721     10.5    6.8     33.6    9.01
>2.5.69              4   374     20.3    5.0     48.1    4.67
>2.5.69-mm3          4   653     11.6    6.2     34.0    8.27
>
>Very similar to 2.5.68-mm3
>
Thanks again Con. These two benchmarks especially are fairly suboptimal
compared with the 68-mm2 days... I hope it is just the larger request queue
size in place in the rq-dyn patch in mm. If you get some time, could you
possibly change include/linux/blkdev.h:BLKDEV_MAX_RQ from 1024 to 128 and
bench these two loads on that setting.

Cheers,
Nick


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.69-mm3 with contest
  2003-05-12  7:55 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2003-05-12  8:29   ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2003-05-12  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: Con Kolivas, linux kernel mailing list, Andrew Morton

On Mon, May 12 2003, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> 
> snip
> 
> >io_load:
> >Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> >2.5.68              3   492     15.9    167.1   19.7    6.23
> >2.5.68-mm1          4   128     59.4    47.6    19.4    1.62
> >2.5.68-mm2          4   131     58.8    47.0    18.9    1.64
> >2.5.68-mm3          4   271     28.4    89.2    17.9    3.39
> >2.5.69              4   343     22.7    120.5   19.8    4.29
> >2.5.69-mm3          4   319     24.5    105.3   18.1    4.04
> >
> snip
> 
> >
> >dbench_load:
> >Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> >2.5.68              3   412     18.4    5.3     47.6    5.22
> >2.5.68-mm1          4   361     21.1    5.5     54.0    4.57
> >2.5.68-mm2          4   345     22.0    4.8     49.3    4.31
> >2.5.68-mm3          4   721     10.5    6.8     33.6    9.01
> >2.5.69              4   374     20.3    5.0     48.1    4.67
> >2.5.69-mm3          4   653     11.6    6.2     34.0    8.27
> >
> >Very similar to 2.5.68-mm3
> >
> Thanks again Con. These two benchmarks especially are fairly suboptimal
> compared with the 68-mm2 days... I hope it is just the larger request queue
> size in place in the rq-dyn patch in mm. If you get some time, could you
> possibly change include/linux/blkdev.h:BLKDEV_MAX_RQ from 1024 to 128 and
> bench these two loads on that setting.

Or just wait for 2.5.70, it has rq-dyn with BLKDEV_MAX_RQ of 128.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-12  8:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-11  6:55 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.69-mm3 with contest Con Kolivas
2003-05-12  7:55 ` Nick Piggin
2003-05-12  8:29   ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox