From: Boris Kurktchiev <techstuff@gmx.net>
To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Posible memory leak!?
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:12:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305141012.53779.techstuff@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305140650.h4E6oCu04880@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
> 09:51:53 up 16:40, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.00
> 56 processes: 55 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states: 0.2% user, 0.4% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% iowait, 99.3% idle
> Mem: 124616k av, 114444k used, 10172k free, 0k shrd, 4k
> buff 53088k active, 46836k inactive
> Swap: 76792k av, 1804k used, 74988k free 53632k
> cached
>
> Can you show "top b n1" (unabridged) and "cat /proc/meminfo", "cat
> /proc/slabinfo" of the "swap usage shoot up to 95%" event?
heh this is very interesting.... top b n1 reports this:
top - 10:08:24 up 16:36, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.19, 0.08
Tasks: 62 total, 1 running, 60 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
Cpu(s): 12.3% user, 5.1% system, 0.0% nice, 82.6% idle
Mem: 385904k total, 381572k used, 4332k free, 137244k buffers
Swap: 128512k total, 20012k used, 108500k free, 126168k cached
while gkrellm reports that my RAM used is 95MB. now this is interesting....
here is the /proc/meminfo:
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 395165696 389582848 5582848 0 141422592 138055680
Swap: 131596288 20623360 110972928
MemTotal: 385904 kB
MemFree: 5452 kB
MemShared: 0 kB
Buffers: 138108 kB
Cached: 127324 kB
SwapCached: 7496 kB
Active: 181268 kB
Inactive: 132244 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 385904 kB
LowFree: 5452 kB
SwapTotal: 128512 kB
SwapFree: 108372 kB
and here is /proc/slabinfo:
slabinfo - version: 1.1
kmem_cache 57 72 108 2 2 1
ip_conntrack 3 24 320 1 2 1
tcp_tw_bucket 0 30 128 0 1 1
tcp_bind_bucket 4 112 32 1 1 1
tcp_open_request 0 0 64 0 0 1
inet_peer_cache 0 0 64 0 0 1
ip_fib_hash 14 112 32 1 1 1
ip_dst_cache 30 40 192 2 2 1
arp_cache 3 30 128 1 1 1
urb_priv 3 59 64 1 1 1
blkdev_requests 1024 1050 128 35 35 1
dnotify_cache 125 169 20 1 1 1
file_lock_cache 7 42 92 1 1 1
fasync_cache 1 202 16 1 1 1
uid_cache 1 112 32 1 1 1
skbuff_head_cache 128 220 192 11 11 1
sock 117 145 768 26 29 1
sigqueue 0 29 132 0 1 1
kiobuf 0 0 64 0 0 1
cdev_cache 19 59 64 1 1 1
bdev_cache 6 59 64 1 1 1
mnt_cache 19 59 64 1 1 1
inode_cache 45164 59479 512 8497 8497 1
dentry_cache 20481 62910 128 2097 2097 1
filp 1262 1290 128 43 43 1
names_cache 0 2 4096 0 2 1
buffer_head 94915 97440 128 3248 3248 1
mm_struct 47 60 192 3 3 1
vm_area_struct 2479 2910 128 90 97 1
fs_cache 46 59 64 1 1 1
files_cache 46 54 448 6 6 1
signal_act 51 57 1344 18 19 1
size-131072(DMA) 0 0 131072 0 0 32
size-131072 0 0 131072 0 0 32
size-65536(DMA) 0 0 65536 0 0 16
size-65536 2 2 65536 2 2 16
size-32768(DMA) 0 0 32768 0 0 8
size-32768 4 4 32768 4 4 8
size-16384(DMA) 0 0 16384 0 0 4
size-16384 9 11 16384 9 11 4
size-8192(DMA) 0 0 8192 0 0 2
size-8192 5 20 8192 5 20 2
size-4096(DMA) 0 0 4096 0 0 1
size-4096 79 95 4096 79 95 1
size-2048(DMA) 0 0 2048 0 0 1
size-2048 10 14 2048 5 7 1
size-1024(DMA) 0 0 1024 0 0 1
size-1024 70 96 1024 18 24 1
size-512(DMA) 0 0 512 0 0 1
size-512 65 80 512 10 10 1
size-256(DMA) 0 0 256 0 0 1
size-256 49 75 256 4 5 1
size-128(DMA) 2 30 128 1 1 1
size-128 883 930 128 30 31 1
size-64(DMA) 0 0 64 0 0 1
size-64 2791 2891 64 49 49 1
size-32(DMA) 36 59 64 1 1 1
size-32 414 472 64 8 8 1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-14 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-13 18:15 Posible memory leak!? Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-14 6:56 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-14 14:12 ` Boris Kurktchiev [this message]
2003-05-15 5:51 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-15 14:24 ` Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-16 8:48 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-05-16 4:03 ` The kernel is miscalculating my RAM Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-16 5:42 ` Chris Friesen
2003-05-16 6:48 ` Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-16 6:50 ` Boris Kurktchiev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-10 6:29 [RFC] new syscall to allow notification when arbitrary pids die Chris Friesen
2003-05-12 3:26 ` Chris Friesen
2003-05-12 3:32 ` Doug McNaught
2003-05-12 3:42 ` Posible memory leak!? Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-12 11:17 ` Boris Kurktchiev
[not found] ` <200305131158.h4DBw2u30860@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2003-05-13 18:17 ` Boris Kurktchiev
2003-05-12 18:06 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305141012.53779.techstuff@gmx.net \
--to=techstuff@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox