public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dean McEwan" <dean_mcewan@linuxmail.org>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Digital Rights Management - An idea (limited lease, renting, expiration, verification) NON HARWARE BASED.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:34:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514153440.14381.qmail@linuxmail.org> (raw)


> The worst problem with expiring software is that a
> company, operating in good faith, can be forced out
> of business because if it.

  You shouldn't buy software from crappy "on_last_legs" 
companies.

> Lets say that I have a company called BestInTheWorld.
> Because I make the best data-base software in the world,
> a lot of companies purchase a license to use this
> software. The software expires in a year. This is no
> problem because The software renewal is cheap. Soon
> every company in Silicon Valley uses my software.
> The company is going strong and needs to expand. It
> issues public stock.
> 
> Al Qaeda

Lets stop there eh? AL <self snipped>QAEDA ? ANY GOV.T 
would let them buy stock? Controlling Stock ???

 purchases controlling interest in the company
> and closes it. In one year, everybody in Silicon Valley
> is out of work because all the company's software
> stopped working.

Say M$ bought company that has "we can change this license 
at any time
for this version of software" written in its license, M$ 
changes it and BOOM! Software now costs another $400,000
to use... 

My DRM would not allow this... Good Eh?

Also GPL sources wouldn't work in proprietary work(s).
 
> 
> Bad joke? Hell no. Digital thought about short-term
> leasing of their software when they introduced LMF,
> the license management facility. Once Digtal's lawyers
> got involved, a patch was sent to everbody making damn
> sure that the "expiration" capability was removed.
> Nevertheless, FTP Software, that made TCP/IP to DECNET
> sofware, continued to have software that expired.
> 
> Basically, in many states in the USA, you can't sell or
> lease something that will become worthless or unusable if
> the seller or leasor no longer exists. If the renter makes
> a good-faith effort to pay the rent, the renter continues
> to enjoy use of the leased property. Creating property that
> doesn't allow this violates common law.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
> Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.
> 

-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-14 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-14 15:34 Dean McEwan [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-15 10:35 Digital Rights Management - An idea (limited lease, renting, expiration, verification) NON HARWARE BASED Dean McEwan
2003-05-14 13:52 Dean McEwan
2003-05-14 13:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-14 14:36 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-14 14:58   ` Larry McVoy
2003-05-14 15:22     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-14 18:48       ` Larry McVoy
2003-05-14 15:12 ` Tomas Szepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030514153440.14381.qmail@linuxmail.org \
    --to=dean_mcewan@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox