From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Christopher Hoover <ch@murgatroid.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:32:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514193221.GA28385@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EC296CE.9050704@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 12:19:42PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> If this is what is wanted (and I don't really think it's useful is a MMU
> is available) you should explain the consequences in the help text.
> Basically, no current and future glibc version has the slightest chance
> of working.
That seems to imply that the current glibc makes futexes mandatory,
which surely isn't the case or we'd not be able to run with 2.4 and earlier
kernels.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-14 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 4:32 [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional Christopher Hoover
2003-05-14 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-14 6:20 ` Miles Bader
2003-05-14 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-14 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-14 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-05-14 7:52 ` Christopher Hoover
2003-05-14 19:19 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-14 19:32 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-05-14 19:44 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-14 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-14 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-14 20:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-14 20:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-14 21:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-15 0:58 ` Christopher Hoover
2003-05-15 1:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-15 2:18 ` Miles Bader
2003-05-15 16:47 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-05-15 17:45 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-15 18:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-05-15 18:16 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-05-15 18:04 ` Christopher Hoover
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 22:26 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-14 22:59 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-05-14 23:33 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-05-15 0:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-15 0:52 ` Christopher Hoover
2003-05-15 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-15 1:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-15 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-15 1:39 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-15 1:42 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-15 2:02 ` Christopher Hoover
2003-05-15 2:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-15 3:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-05-15 3:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-15 18:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-05-16 21:55 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-17 0:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-05-17 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-17 9:40 ` Werner Almesberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030514193221.GA28385@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=ch@murgatroid.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox