From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:57:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514215704.GA4232@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030514.140257.26294164.davem@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:02:57PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:59:49 -0700
>
> Any reason to not just use a struct device here? This is a device,
> right? Or at the very least, a kobject would be acceptable.
>
> As I understand it, it's a device private for a struct netdevice.
Ah, thanks.
> It is referenced much differently, I don't think using kobject
> is as appropriate as one might expect.
kobjects are always appropriate! :)
Remember, you don't have to use the sysfs part of a kobject to get the
reference counting and callback when the last reference is dropped
goodness. A few places in the kernel use them in this manner only,
that's what it was created for.
Ok, if they aren't needed here, I have no problem, just wanted to make
sure.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-14 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 20:20 [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev chas williams
2003-05-14 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 22:16 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 4:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 14:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 20:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 20:20 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 0:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 16:05 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 20:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 20:59 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 21:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-05-14 22:21 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 5:20 ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 14:32 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 19:09 ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 19:17 ` chas williams
2003-05-20 12:25 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 0:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 14:40 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 15:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 18:48 ` Francois Romieu
2003-05-22 17:59 ` Linux 2.4 scheduler is RTOS-alike? Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:01 ` Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:37 ` Elladan
2003-05-22 20:47 ` Elladan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030514215704.GA4232@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox