[BK] [PATCH] [2.4] ReiserFS export balance_dirty

[BK] [PATCH] [2.4] ReiserFS export balance_dirty

[Hans Reiser]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 24 bytes --]

please apply

-- 
Hans


[-- Attachment #2: [PATCH] [2.4] export balance_dirty --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2462 bytes --]

From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [2.4] export balance_dirty
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:17:43 +0400
Message-ID: <20030514131743.GB1875@namesys.com>

Hello!

    We seem to need balance_dirty to be exported now with latest
    reiserfs patches (so that reiserfs can be built as module).
    Please apply (against latest 2.4 bk tree).

    Thank you.

Bye,
    Oleg

===== fs/buffer.c 1.82 vs edited =====
--- 1.82/fs/buffer.c	Mon Dec 16 09:22:07 2002
+++ edited/fs/buffer.c	Wed May 14 16:51:00 2003
@@ -1026,6 +1026,7 @@
 		write_some_buffers(NODEV);
 	}
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty);
 
 inline void __mark_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [BK] [PATCH] [2.4] ReiserFS export balance_dirty

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Hans Reiser wrote:
> Subject:
> [PATCH] [2.4] export balance_dirty
> From:
> Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
> 
> ===== fs/buffer.c 1.82 vs edited =====
> --- 1.82/fs/buffer.c	Mon Dec 16 09:22:07 2002
> +++ edited/fs/buffer.c	Wed May 14 16:51:00 2003
> @@ -1026,6 +1026,7 @@
>  		write_some_buffers(NODEV);
>  	}
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty);
>  
>  inline void __mark_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
>  {

Any reason why you don't put this in ksyms.c?
This is a honest question, no flamebait.


Carl-Daniel

Re: [BK] [PATCH] [2.4] ReiserFS export balance_dirty

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:27:47AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
 > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty);
 > 
 > Any reason why you don't put this in ksyms.c?
 > This is a honest question, no flamebait.

because it follows the style of the rest of fs/buffer.c

		Dave