public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:14:57 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030515.171457.02279102.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305152020.h4FKKfGi014696@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>

   From: chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
   Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:20:41 -0400

   i suspect atm doesnt use rtnl because its register/unregister
   function dont use the underlying netdevice layer (when perhaps it
   should).

There is no correlation between whether you use netdevice or not
and whether network configuration changes should be synchronized
using the RTNL semaphore :-)

   thanks for the pointer.
   
No problem.

   here is the the atm_dev locking patch with the __module_get change:
   
Ok, I'll apply this.  But long term we really need to clean out
the cobwebs here, use RTNL, do solid module refcounting etc.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-16  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-14 20:20 [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev chas williams
2003-05-14 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 22:16   ` chas williams
2003-05-15  4:30     ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 14:39       ` chas williams
2003-05-15 20:10         ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 20:20           ` chas williams
2003-05-16  0:14             ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-05-16 16:05               ` chas williams
2003-05-16 20:44                 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16  0:19             ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 20:59 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 21:02   ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 21:57     ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 22:21   ` chas williams
2003-05-15  5:20     ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 14:32       ` chas williams
2003-05-15 19:09         ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 19:17           ` chas williams
2003-05-20 12:25             ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16  0:12         ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 14:40         ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 15:39           ` chas williams
2003-05-16 18:48             ` Francois Romieu
2003-05-22 17:59   ` Linux 2.4 scheduler is RTOS-alike? Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:01   ` Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:37     ` Elladan
2003-05-22 20:47     ` Elladan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030515.171457.02279102.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox