From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262371AbTENOth (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:49:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262373AbTENOth (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:49:37 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:43208 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262371AbTENOtg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 10:49:36 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: "ismail donmez" , gutko@poczta.onet.pl Subject: Re: supermount Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 01:04:23 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1052919631.273b9220kde@smtp-send.myrealbox.com> In-Reply-To: <1052919631.273b9220kde@smtp-send.myrealbox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305150104.23616.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2003 23:40, ismail donmez wrote: > Yeah I wonder the same for some time . Is there a good reason not to > include supermount in kernel? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maciej Górnicki > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:30:02 +0200 > Subject: supermount > > Hello, > Why supermount code is not included in kernel? > It's maintained by Juan Jose Quintela from Mandrake... Watch this space. There's some work happening with 2.4 bug testing with some supermount development work and then 2.5 will follow soon enough. The current version (call it a fork?) of 1.2.5 has a problem with filesystems that can write the same file with different case (eg vfat writing file.c and File.c) but can be found at the new sourceforge home: http://supermount-ng.sf.net A bugfix for that known bug should be available soon and then it will need lots more testing... Con