The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ and resource for platform_device
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:30:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030515173052.C31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030515090350.A7685@home.com>; from mporter@kernel.crashing.org on Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:50AM -0700

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:50AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:59:20PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > The location and interrupt of some platform devices are only known by
> > platform specific code.  In order to avoid putting platform specific
> > parameters into drivers, place resource and irq members into struct
> > platform_device.
> > 
> > Discussion point: is one resource and one irq enough?
> 
> No.
> 
> We have the same need for PPC SoC and system controller on-chip
> devices.  Some devices have multiple interrupts and/or resources.

Is there a sane limit on the number of interrupts and resources for one
device?

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-15 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-15 13:59 [PATCH] IRQ and resource for platform_device Russell King
2003-05-15 16:03 ` Matt Porter
2003-05-15 16:30   ` Russell King [this message]
2003-05-15 17:35     ` Matt Porter
2003-05-15 18:13       ` Russell King
2003-05-15 18:32         ` Matt Porter
2003-05-15 19:54           ` Patrick Mochel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030515173052.C31491@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    --cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox