From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264453AbTEPOE3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 10:04:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264456AbTEPOE3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 10:04:29 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:30527 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264453AbTEPOE3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 10:04:29 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200305161417.h4GEHJJ18387@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Incorrect AMD74xx UDMA100 test. To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200305150331.h4F3V5KB000583@deviant.impure.org.uk> from "davej@codemonkey.org.uk" at Mai 15, 2003 04:31:05 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > We do 80wire comparisons based on an uninitialised var. > Shouldn't we also be doing the 80wire check on the UDMA66 case ? Yeah I thought that was fixed in 2.5.x and 2.4.x already