From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264569AbTEPTv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 15:51:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264593AbTEPTv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 15:51:59 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.iol.cz ([194.228.2.87]:1763 "EHLO smtp-out2.iol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264569AbTEPTv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2003 15:51:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 21:55:36 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] laptop mode, #2 Message-ID: <20030516195535.GC372@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20030516113309.GY812@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030516113309.GY812@suse.de> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Made a few tweaks and adjustments: > > - If block_dump is set, also dump who is marking a page/buffer as dirty. > akpm recommended this. > > - Don't touch default bdflush parameters (see script) > > That's about it. I've gotten several mails who really like the patch and > that it really adds a non-significant amount of extra battery > time. I Non-significant? Like it adds no time at all? > consider the patch final at this point. > > Patch is against 2.4.21-rc2 (ish) It looks nice, but without Documentation/laptop_mode, I can't say much more ;-)))). Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]