From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261301AbTEQIER (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 04:04:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261308AbTEQIER (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 04:04:17 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:1182 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261301AbTEQIEO (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 May 2003 04:04:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:16:58 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] laptop mode, #2 Message-ID: <20030517081658.GU812@suse.de> References: <20030516113309.GY812@suse.de> <20030516195535.GC372@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030516195535.GC372@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 16 2003, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Made a few tweaks and adjustments: > > > > - If block_dump is set, also dump who is marking a page/buffer as dirty. > > akpm recommended this. > > > > - Don't touch default bdflush parameters (see script) > > > > That's about it. I've gotten several mails who really like the patch and > > that it really adds a non-significant amount of extra battery > > time. I > > Non-significant? Like it adds no time at all? Woops, that was reversed :) > > consider the patch final at this point. > > > > Patch is against 2.4.21-rc2 (ish) > > It looks nice, but without Documentation/laptop_mode, I can't say much > more ;-)))). The attached script basically explained everything, but yes I will add a laptop_mode file as well. -- Jens Axboe