From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262486AbTESRX0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:23:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262390AbTESRX0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:23:26 -0400 Received: from shell.cyberus.ca ([216.191.236.4]:21008 "EHLO shell.cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261994AbTESRXY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 13:23:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:36:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamal Hadi To: "David S. Miller" cc: fw@deneb.enyo.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress In-Reply-To: <20030518.023151.77034834.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20030519132819.S38814@shell.cyberus.ca> References: <87d6iit4g7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20030517.150933.74723581.davem@redhat.com> <87iss87gqd.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20030518.023151.77034834.davem@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Florian, I actually asked you to run some tests last time you showed up on netdev but never heard back. Maybe we can get some results now that the complaining is still continuing. Note, we cant just invent things because "CISCO is doing it like that". That doesnt cut it. What we need is data to substantiate things and then we move from there. And oh, i am pretty sure we can beat any of the BSDs forwarding rate. Anyone wants a duel, lets meet at the water fountain by the town hall at sunrise. cheers, jamal