* And yet another it87 patch.
@ 2003-05-18 22:21 Zephaniah E. Hull
2003-05-19 17:39 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zephaniah E. Hull @ 2003-05-18 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]
Trivial, but important.
Somehow in the patching the bk tree somehow got two memset's to clear
new_client in it87_detect, normally while this would be bad, it would
not be critical.
However one of the two happens BEFORE the variable is set, and thus
things go badly.
--
1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull <warp@babylon.d2dc.net>
92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801
CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested.
>OK, fine. You're arguing semantics, though.
"arguing semantics" is not the same as "arguing nomenclature". My DI
was very good at arguing semantics. He had this funny idea that an
"unloaded" weapon was one that you had personally inspected and that
the semantic difference mattered. Something about not wanting to do
the paperwork of one of us killed someone with an unloaded weapon.
Most technical debates are ultimately about semantics, but that
doesn't mean that they are unimportant.
-- Shmuel Metz and Steve Sobol on ASR.
--- linux-2.5.69-mm6/drivers/i2c/chips/it87.c.orig 2003-05-17 03:37:19.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.5.69-mm6/drivers/i2c/chips/it87.c 2003-05-17 03:37:28.000000000 -0400
@@ -630,7 +630,6 @@
}
}
}
- memset (new_client, 0x00, sizeof(struct i2c_client) + sizeof(struct it87_data));
/* OK. For now, we presume we have a valid client. We now create the
client structure, even though we cannot fill it completely yet.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: And yet another it87 patch.
2003-05-18 22:21 And yet another it87 patch Zephaniah E. Hull
@ 2003-05-19 17:39 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-05-19 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:21:50PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Trivial, but important.
>
> Somehow in the patching the bk tree somehow got two memset's to clear
> new_client in it87_detect, normally while this would be bad, it would
> not be critical.
>
> However one of the two happens BEFORE the variable is set, and thus
> things go badly.
That's a wierd merge problem, sorry about that.
Applied.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-19 17:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-18 22:21 And yet another it87 patch Zephaniah E. Hull
2003-05-19 17:39 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox