From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262934AbTESVU0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 17:20:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262946AbTESVUZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 17:20:25 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:7183 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262934AbTESVUY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 17:20:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 23:33:15 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Sam Ravnborg , torvalds@transmeta.com, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove 'strchr' warning from reiserfs Message-ID: <20030519213315.GA1069@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Hemminger , Sam Ravnborg , torvalds@transmeta.com, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030517191611.GA10417@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030519124712.2c4b692d.shemminger@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030519124712.2c4b692d.shemminger@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Is this gcc behaviour documented anywhere? I dropped a mail to gcc-bugs - the reply was: ======= The kernel is a special case; GCC is entitled to assume the existence of standard C library functions. ======= So when messing with standard functions we may expect a few suprises, which I think is fair enough. Sam