From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263643AbTETIrf (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 04:47:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263642AbTETIrf (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 04:47:35 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:46033 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263633AbTETIrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 04:47:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:00:18 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Dave Hansen Cc: William Lee Irwin III , "David S. Miller" , Arjan van de Ven , Badari Pulavarty , lkml , Gerrit Huizenga , John Stultz , James Cleverdon , Andrew Morton , Keith Mannthey Subject: Re: userspace irq balancer Message-ID: <20030520090017.D17268@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200305191314.06216.pbadari@us.ibm.com> <1053382055.5959.346.camel@nighthawk> <20030519221111.P7061@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1053382943.4827.358.camel@nighthawk> <1053401130.6830.3.camel@rth.ninka.net> <20030520034622.GK8978@holomorphy.com> <1053407030.13207.253.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1053407030.13207.253.camel@nighthawk>; from haveblue@us.ibm.com on Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:03:50PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:03:50PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > Does anyone have a patch to tear it out already? Is the current proc > interface acceptable, or do we want a syscall interface like wli > suggests? I have no problems with the proc interface; it's ascii so reasonably extendible in the future for, say, when 64 cpus on 32 bit linux get supported. It's also not THAT inefficient since my code only uses it when some binding changes, not all the time.