From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261706AbTEUH7E (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 03:59:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261788AbTEUH4A (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 03:56:00 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:37591 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261780AbTEUHn0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2003 03:43:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:07:32 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Duncan Sands Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] USB speedtouch update Message-ID: <20030521020732.GA7939@kroah.com> References: <200305210049.24619.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305210049.24619.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > The following patches are against Greg's 2.5 USB tree. > They contain a rewrite of the packet reception code and > many tweaks. I've applied all of these to my tree, but I didn't apply the following to Linus's tree because they just didn't apply. I tried to fix up a few by hand, and got some of them to work, but eventually gave up on the rest. So here's a list of the ones that didn't go into Linus's tree: USB speedtouch: use optimally sized reconstruction buffers USB speedtouch: send path micro optimizations USB speedtouch: kfree_skb -> dev_kfree_skb USB speedtouch: receive code rewrite Also this one didn't go into Linus's tree, as it's already there: USB speedtouch: remove MOD_XXX_USE_COUNT So, any patches against Linus's latest bk tree to bring the above into sync would be appreciated. thanks, greg k-h