From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: maneesh@in.ibm.com, ivg2@cornell.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, page0588@sundance.sjsu.edu,
greg@kroah.com, tytso@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at include/linux/dcache.h:271!
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 08:25:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030523062508.GN812@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030522151954.1230ef53.akpm@digeo.com>
On Thu, May 22 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that we have multiple ramdisks but all have
> > common request queue and common elevator. In terms of sysfs we
> > have multiple kobjects for multiple ramdisks, but one single kobject for the
> > ramdisks' common elevator.
> >
> > While initializing, different kobjects are allocated for the ramdisks but,
> > the common elevator uses the same kobject. In other words, every init
> > of a ramdisk, the common elevator.kobj->parent will be different and it will
> > allocate a new dentry, overwrite the elevator.kobj->dentry
> > and loose the earlier allocated dentries. (see: elv_register_queue())
> >
> > While exiting, it ends up in removing the same dentry (allocated at the last)
> > again and BUGs in dget on dentry with zero ref count.
> >
> > Not sure where it should be fixed
> > ramdisk
> > - should have separate queues on for each ramdisk
> >
> > elevator
> > - should not re-register already registered queue in elv_register_queue
> >
> > sysfs
> > - should handle kobject with multiple parent kobjects
>
> I can't think of anywhere else where we are likely to want to support
> multiple devices from a single queue in this manner, so perhaps the best
> solution is to remove the exceptional case: allocate a separate queue for
> each ramdisk instance.
>
> Jens, do you agree?
Completely and utterly agree :)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-23 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-21 23:11 kernel BUG at include/linux/dcache.h:271! Ivan Gyurdiev
2003-05-22 11:57 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-05-22 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-23 6:25 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-05-23 12:43 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-05-23 12:55 ` Maneesh Soni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030523062508.GN812@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ivg2@cornell.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=page0588@sundance.sjsu.edu \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox