From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262703AbTEXRwu (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 13:52:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262627AbTEXRwu (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 13:52:50 -0400 Received: from deviant.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.238]:34498 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262703AbTEXRws (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 13:52:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 19:06:37 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Gutko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-RC2 Nforce2 AGP patch Message-ID: <20030524180637.GA14838@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Gutko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3ECFA5F9.6060906@poczta.onet.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ECFA5F9.6060906@poczta.onet.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:03:53PM +0200, Gutko wrote: > Same again but with proper topic > Sorry for this > Gutko > ---------- > > Hello, > This is patch against 2.4.21-rc2 adding Nvidia Nforce1/Nforce2 AGP > chipset support.It worked very good on 2.4.21-rc2-ac3. I found this > patch here : http://etudiant.epita.fr:8000/~nonolk/nforce-agp.diff > > Don't know who ported it from 2.5.69, however I know this address above > belongs to author of this patch This is based on an old backport, and has at least one bug in it. (It must use its own insert/remove, or you get problems with 32MB apertures). Dave