public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, miquels@cistron-office.nl
Subject: Re: [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:08:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030529180830.GG5643@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ED6426F.6010807@wanadoo.es>

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:25:03PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
> --from the http://procps.sourceforge.net/faq.html --
> Why are there so many procps projects?
> 
> The original maintainer seems to have had little time for procps.
> Whatever his reasons, the project didn't get maintained. Starting
> in 1997, Albert Cahalan wrote a new ps program for the package.
> For the next few years, Albert quietly helped the Debian package
> maintainer fix bugs. In 2001, Rik van Riel decided to do something
> about what appeared to be the lack of a maintainer. He picked up
> the buggy old code in Red Hat's CVS and started adding patches.
> Meanwhile, other people have patched procps in a great many ways.
> In 2002, Albert moved procps to this site. This was done to ensure
> that years of testing and bug fixes would not be lost. The major
> version number was changed to 3, partly to avoid confusing users
> and partly because the top program has been redone.
> --end--
> 
> I think too that is to waste the time&resources to have two,
> and to do a little  different some LiNUX distributions in a basic
> and important package
> 
> but if both have freetime... ;-)

Well, since I read Albert Cahalan's comment in Debian bug #172735 [1] 
I understand the people maintaining a different branch...

> regards,

cu
Adrian

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/172735

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-29 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-29 17:25 [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-29 18:08 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-05-29 11:16   ` Robert Love
2003-05-29 20:01   ` Vincent Hanquez
2003-05-29 15:40     ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-31  2:36 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30 18:59 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30  8:12 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2003-05-30  8:20 ` cosmos
     [not found] <1054270854.22088.617.camel@cube>
2003-05-30  6:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-01  4:53   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-05-30 16:56 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
     [not found] ` <3ED788B5.2080203@wanadoo.es>
2003-05-31  1:25   ` Albert Cahalan
2003-05-30  5:30 Albert Cahalan
2003-05-28 15:09 Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:19 ` Phil Oester
2003-05-28 16:22   ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:59     ` Miquel van Smoorenburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030529180830.GG5643@fs.tum.de \
    --to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquels@cistron-office.nl \
    --cc=xose@wanadoo.es \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox