From: Michael Buesch <fsdeveloper@yahoo.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: pdflush -> noflushd related question
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 18:41:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305311841.59599.fsdeveloper@yahoo.de> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I want to fix the userspace noflushd daemon to run on 2.5 kernels,
but it seems to get *very* tricky, because bdflush, kupdated have been
replaced by pdflush.
I've grepped through the lkml-archives and I found a post from you, Andrew,
that sayed:
[SNIP]
Subject: [patch] replace kupdate and bdflush with pdflush
- - use a timer to kick off a pdflush thread every five seconds
to run the kupdate code.
- - wakeup_bdflush() kicks off a pdflush thread to run the current
bdflush function.
There's some loss of functionality here - the ability to tune
the writeback periods. The numbers are hardwired at present.
But the intent is that buffer-based writeback disappears
altogether. New mechanisms for tuning the writeback will
need to be introduced.
[SNIP]
Yea, but it seems, that I need exactly this lost functionality. :)
noflushd, on 2.4 kernels, prevents the disks to spin up by spinning
them down an stopping the kupdated daemon through putting
the update-interval to 0 via syscall bdflush().
That's the code to do so:
bdflush(2 + (1 << 3) + 1, interval);
So, how to set the interval, or better sayed, how to _stop_
buffer flushing in 2.5?
Has this lost functionality already been re-implemented?
Are there new syscalls?
Thanks for your help.
- --
Regards Michael Büsch
http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft
18:29:24 up 4:01, 2 users, load average: 1.11, 1.09, 1.05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+2NtXoxoigfggmSgRArisAJ9KTnvSW51e4OnLvkvjI/D/bUF19ACeK9Yw
xOVOelmYmHd9eC7Unuys8pM=
=t+79
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-31 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-31 16:41 Michael Buesch [this message]
2003-05-31 17:58 ` pdflush -> noflushd related question Andrew Morton
2003-05-31 18:24 ` Michael Buesch
2003-05-31 18:36 ` Michael Buesch
2003-05-31 18:42 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305311841.59599.fsdeveloper@yahoo.de \
--to=fsdeveloper@yahoo.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox