From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] PCI and PCI Hotplug changes and fixes for 2.5.70
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:59:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030605085938.GC16879@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030605084933.GI2329@kroah.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:49:33AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > - pci_for_each_dev(device)
> > + while ((device = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, device)) != NULL)
> >
> > when you could have just added whatever locking pci_find_device() does
> > to pci_for_each_dev() You'd then not have had to touch any of these
> > drivers, and it'd look a damn sight better to look at IMO.
>
> pci_for_each_dev() is currently a macro, not a function, and I'm trying
> to get rid of all public access to the pci lists. The majority of pci
> drivers use the pci_find_device() function in just the way that I
> converted the few remaining users of pci_for_each_dev() to (yeah, "few"
> is a relative number, but check out how many people call
> pci_find_device()...)
>
> I guess I could create this to clean it up a bit:
> #define pci_find_all_devices(dev) pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev)
>
> but that's really not that much of a change...
so why not..
#define pci_for_each_dev(dev) \
while ((device = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, device)) != NULL)
?
Seems to be the same change you made tree-wide, with minimal
interruption to drivers.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-05 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 1:31 [BK PATCH] PCI and PCI Hotplug changes and fixes for 2.5.70 Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 9:19 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 17:04 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 17:57 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 2:14 ` [BK PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-06-05 8:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 8:49 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 8:59 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-06-05 9:06 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 9:18 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 9:22 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 17:18 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 19:10 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030605085938.GC16879@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox