From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] PCI and PCI Hotplug changes and fixes for 2.5.70
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:18:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030605171835.GC5424@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030605091802.GA17356@suse.de>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:18:02AM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> The fact that a tree-wide 'cleanup' like this goes in just a few hours
> after its posted before chance to comment is another argument, but
> concentrating on the technical point here, I still think this is a
> step backwards.
Why? I just got rid of a function (well macro) that isn't even needed
(as proven by replacing it with an existing function.) That's
technically a good thing :)
Now I can agree that some of those replacements could be done with a
different function call, as almost none of the replacements in the
driver/* tree really want to walk all of the pci devices in the tree.
They usually just want to walk all devices of a type of pci device (be
it capability, or other trait.) I'd be glad to take changes of this
sort in the future.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-05 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 1:31 [BK PATCH] PCI and PCI Hotplug changes and fixes for 2.5.70 Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 2:05 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 9:19 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 17:04 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 17:57 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 2:14 ` [BK PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-06-05 8:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 8:49 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 8:59 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 9:06 ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 9:18 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 9:22 ` Russell King
2003-06-05 17:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-06-05 19:10 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030605171835.GC5424@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox