From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:40:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030606134049.D3232@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030606.085558.56056656.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:55:58AM -0700
David S. Miller wrote:
> Because ATM devices have always been "funny", and there
> is so much infrastructure, and frankly sanity, they can
> share by being more netdevice like.
Yes, and I agree that it's important that this gets fixed.
Also, the code was basically unmaintained for about two
years, and that shows.
I'm just pointing out that "asynchronizing" some internal
process that is perfectly happy with being synchronous
(and consistent with the semantics of ATM, which themselves
are quite "funny" most of the time) strikes me as a not
very helpful move.
> Tell me it at least uses netlink ;(
Nope, pure DIY. Actually, I think at the time when I wrote
that stuff ('95), SIOC* still ruled the world ...
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-06 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 15:28 [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2) chas williams
2003-06-06 9:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 10:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 11:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 13:57 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 14:07 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:13 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:26 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:28 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:54 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 16:40 ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2003-06-06 21:54 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 23:19 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:44 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-07 0:44 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:59 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:10 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 23:37 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 21:43 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 22:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:52 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:51 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:12 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:58 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 19:01 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 6:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 22:32 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 5:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 22:59 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:14 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:39 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 18:27 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 3:45 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-08 6:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 21:34 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-10 22:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 23:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:06 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:45 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 18:18 ` Ryan Anderson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 15:36 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 16:03 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-07 6:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 3:31 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:55 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:56 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 3:48 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 13:37 ` Duncan Sands
2003-06-09 13:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 13:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 14:54 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 7:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 4:05 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:06 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:05 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 17:03 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 11:25 ` David Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030606134049.D3232@almesberger.net \
--to=wa@almesberger.net \
--cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox