From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: wa@almesberger.net
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:02:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030607.000233.115915549.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030606221100.L3232@almesberger.net>
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 22:11:00 -0300
When a driver's "close" function returns, the driver must have
released all externally visible resources (e.g. VPI/VCI) that
belong to the VCC, and ideally all invisible resources (e.g.
buffers). There must be no more calls to "push".
In return, the stack must not make any other calls for that
VCC after invoking "close".
This is exactly how netdevice's WON'T be acting anymore.
All netdevice objects are allocated dynamically, and unregister
just means "disconnect" not "free". It marks the device as
dead, and NULLs out all the callbacks in the netdevice struct.
Any further attempt to use the device (via some PROCFS file I/O
or whatever) will just error out.
So we return long before all references go away, and the final
netdevice reference put does the de-allocation of the netdevice
struct.
Totally asynchronous, and it just works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-07 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-05 15:28 [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2) chas williams
2003-06-06 9:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 10:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 11:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 13:57 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 14:07 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:13 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:26 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:28 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 15:54 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 15:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 16:40 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 21:54 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 23:19 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:44 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-07 0:44 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:59 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:10 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 23:37 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 21:43 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-06-06 22:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:52 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:51 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:12 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:58 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 19:01 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 6:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 22:32 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 5:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 22:59 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:14 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 23:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-09 23:39 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 18:27 ` Roman Zippel
2003-06-08 3:45 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-08 6:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-10 21:34 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-10 22:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 23:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:06 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:45 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 18:18 ` Ryan Anderson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 11:19 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 15:36 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-07 16:03 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-07 6:53 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-08 3:31 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 23:55 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 0:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 0:56 ` chas williams
2003-06-07 1:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 3:48 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 13:37 ` Duncan Sands
2003-06-09 13:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 13:58 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-09 14:54 ` chas williams
2003-06-09 14:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-07 7:02 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-06-08 4:05 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-07 11:06 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:05 ` chas williams
2003-06-06 15:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-06 17:03 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-06-06 11:25 ` David Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030607.000233.115915549.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox