From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] And yet more PCI fixes for 2.5.70
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:38:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030611163837.GA24951@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055335057.2083.14.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:37:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2003-06-11 at 01:11, Greg KH wrote:
> > /* user supplied value */
> > system_bus_speed = idebus_parameter;
> > - } else if (pci_present()) {
> > + } else if (pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, NULL) != NULL) {
>
> That is just gross. pci_present() is far more readable even if you make
> it an inline in pci.h that is pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> NULL)
Bartlomiej was actually the one who suggested this patch, I didn't do it
on my own :)
Anyway, there are only 2 places in the whole kernel that want a
pci_present() check, this place, and drivers/sbus/sbus.c. sbus.c can
probably be changed to not need it at all, but I did it this way to be
safe.
So that leaves only this file. Jeff Garzik and I talked about removing
pci_present() as it's not needed, and I think for this one case we can
live without it. Do you want me to make the pci_present() macro earlier
in this file, so it's readable again? I don't want to put it back into
pci.h.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 0:11 [BK PATCH] And yet more PCI fixes for 2.5.70 Greg KH
2003-06-11 0:11 ` [PATCH] " Greg KH
2003-06-11 0:11 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 0:11 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 0:11 ` Greg KH
2003-06-11 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-11 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-11 12:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-11 16:38 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-06-11 17:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-11 17:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-11 19:13 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030611163837.GA24951@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox