Re: Wrong number of cpus detected/reported

[Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 02:17, Timothy Miller wrote:
> mikpe@csd.uu.se wrote:
> > Steven Cole writes:
> >  > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 15:35, Alan Cox wrote:
> >  > > > wp		: yes
> >  > > > flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr mca cmov
> >  > > > pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm bogomips	:
> >  > > > 2798.38
> >  > > >
> >  > > > See that ht flag near the end?
> >  > >
> >  > > The ht flag means the ht facilities (mtrr etc) are present, doesnt
> >  > > mean HT necessarily is
> >  >
> >  > Is there a reliable method, apart from knowing 'a priori' the mapping
> >  > from CPU models and stepping to hyperthreading capability?
> >
> > Yes. Execute cpuid with eax=1 on each CPU. ebx describes among other
> > things the number of threads and which thread you're on. If you ever find
> > yourself on a non-zero thread, you have HT.
>
> I presume, however, that to get into a non-zero thread, you have to turn
> HT on.  That is, when the machine first powers up, there is nothing for
> the second thread to execute, so it's turned off.  (I'm assuming
> something similar for SMP boxes.)  So, the real question should be,
> before you attempt to turn on HT, how do you find out whether or you CAN
> turn on HT.
>
http://sourceforge.net/projects/cpucounter/

Con