From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com,
greg@kroah.com, sds@epoch.ncsc.mil
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:10:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030613001021.D31636@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
Bcc: chris@wirex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules 1/4
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20030613000409.B31636@figure1.int.wirex.com>; from chris@wirex.com on Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:04:09AM -0700
[LSM] early init for security modules. As discussed before, this allows
for early initialization of security modules when compiled statically
into the kernel. The standard do_initcalls is too late for complete
coverage of all filesystems and threads, for example.
--- linus-2.5/arch/alpha/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/alpha/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:04 2003
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
__con_initcall_end = .;
}
+ . = ALIGN(8);
+ SECURITY_INIT
+
. = ALIGN(64);
__per_cpu_start = .;
.data.percpu : { *(.data.percpu) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/arm/vmlinux-armo.lds.in.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/arm/vmlinux-armo.lds.in Thu Jun 12 00:40:04 2003
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
*(.con_initcall.init)
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(32768);
__init_end = .;
}
--- linus-2.5/arch/arm/vmlinux-armv.lds.in.early_init Sun Apr 27 08:35:24 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/arm/vmlinux-armv.lds.in Thu Jun 12 00:40:04 2003
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
*(.con_initcall.init)
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(32);
__initramfs_start = .;
usr/built-in.o(.init.ramfs)
--- linus-2.5/arch/cris/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Fri Feb 14 14:37:05 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/cris/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 22:41:51 2003
@@ -74,7 +74,12 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
*(.con_initcall.init)
__con_initcall_end = .;
-
+ }
+ .security_initcall.init : {
+ __security_initcall_start = .;
+ *(.security_initcall.init)
+ __security_initcall_end = .;
+
/* We fill to the next page, so we can discard all init
pages without needing to consider what payload might be
appended to the kernel image. */
--- linus-2.5/arch/h8300/platform/h8300h/generic/rom.ld.early_init Thu Apr 17 12:30:45 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/h8300/platform/h8300h/generic/rom.ld Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
___con_initcall_start = .;
*(.con_initcall.init)
___con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4);
___initramfs_start = .;
*(.init.ramfs)
--- linus-2.5/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Tue May 6 06:54:06 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4);
__alt_instructions = .;
.altinstructions : { *(.altinstructions) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/ia64/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/ia64/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -141,6 +141,10 @@
.con_initcall.init : AT(ADDR(.con_initcall.init) - PAGE_OFFSET)
{ *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ __security_initcall_start = .;
+ .security_initcall.init : AT(ADDR(.security_initcall.init) - PAGE_OFFSET)
+ { *(.security_initcall.init) }
+ __security_initcall_end = .;
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
__init_end = .;
--- linus-2.5/arch/m68k/vmlinux-std.lds.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/m68k/vmlinux-std.lds Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(8192);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/m68k/vmlinux-sun3.lds.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/m68k/vmlinux-sun3.lds Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(8192);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/m68knommu/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Tue May 27 20:13:11 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/m68knommu/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:05 2003
@@ -277,9 +277,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
*(.con_initcall.init)
__con_initcall_end = .;
- __security_initcall_start = .;
- *(.security_initcall.init)
- __security_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4);
__initramfs_start = .;
*(.init.ramfs)
--- linus-2.5/arch/mips/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Fri Feb 14 15:09:55 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/mips/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:06 2003
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096); /* Align double page for init_task_union */
__init_end = .;
--- linus-2.5/arch/mips64/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Fri Feb 14 15:10:00 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/mips64/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:06 2003
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096); /* Align double page for init_task_union */
__init_end = .;
--- linus-2.5/arch/parisc/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/parisc/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:06 2003
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Mon May 26 04:58:49 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/ppc/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:06 2003
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
+
__start___ftr_fixup = .;
__ftr_fixup : { *(__ftr_fixup) }
__stop___ftr_fixup = .;
--- linus-2.5/arch/ppc64/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/ppc64/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:07 2003
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/s390/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Mon May 26 12:20:42 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/s390/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:07 2003
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(256);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.initramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/sh/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Fri Feb 14 15:11:24 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/sh/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:08 2003
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
__machvec_start = .;
.machvec.init : { *(.machvec.init) }
__machvec_end = .;
--- linus-2.5/arch/sparc/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/sparc/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:09 2003
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/sparc64/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Wed Apr 2 00:42:56 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/sparc64/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:09 2003
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(8192);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/arch/x86_64/vmlinux.lds.S.early_init Fri May 23 03:56:33 2003
+++ linus-2.5/arch/x86_64/vmlinux.lds.S Thu Jun 12 00:40:10 2003
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@
__con_initcall_start = .;
.con_initcall.init : { *(.con_initcall.init) }
__con_initcall_end = .;
+ SECURITY_INIT
. = ALIGN(4096);
__initramfs_start = .;
.init.ramfs : { *(.init.ramfs) }
--- linus-2.5/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.early_init Mon Feb 3 13:00:30 2003
+++ linus-2.5/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h Thu Jun 12 00:40:10 2003
@@ -45,3 +45,9 @@
*(__ksymtab_strings) \
}
+#define SECURITY_INIT \
+ .security_initcall.init : { \
+ __security_initcall_start = .; \
+ *(.security_initcall.init) \
+ __security_initcall_end = .; \
+ }
--- linus-2.5/include/linux/init.h.early_init Mon Mar 3 13:05:26 2003
+++ linus-2.5/include/linux/init.h Thu Jun 12 00:40:10 2003
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
typedef void (*exitcall_t)(void);
extern initcall_t __con_initcall_start, __con_initcall_end;
+extern initcall_t __security_initcall_start, __security_initcall_end;
#endif
#ifndef MODULE
@@ -96,6 +97,9 @@
#define console_initcall(fn) \
static initcall_t __initcall_##fn __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ (".con_initcall.init")))=fn
+#define security_initcall(fn) \
+ static initcall_t __initcall_##fn __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ (".security_initcall.init"))) = fn
+
struct obs_kernel_param {
const char *str;
int (*setup_func)(char *);
@@ -142,6 +146,8 @@
#define fs_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
#define device_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
#define late_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
+
+#define security_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
/* These macros create a dummy inline: gcc 2.9x does not count alias
as usage, hence the `unused function' warning when __init functions
--- linus-2.5/init/main.c.early_init Fri Jun 6 17:30:07 2003
+++ linus-2.5/init/main.c Thu Jun 12 00:40:11 2003
@@ -439,8 +439,8 @@
pte_chain_init();
fork_init(num_physpages);
proc_caches_init();
- security_scaffolding_startup();
buffer_init();
+ security_scaffolding_startup();
vfs_caches_init(num_physpages);
radix_tree_init();
signals_init();
--- linus-2.5/security/capability.c.early_init Mon Feb 17 12:08:10 2003
+++ linus-2.5/security/capability.c Thu Jun 12 00:40:11 2003
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
}
}
-module_init (capability_init);
+security_initcall (capability_init);
module_exit (capability_exit);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Standard Linux Capabilities Security Module");
--- linus-2.5/security/root_plug.c.early_init Mon Jun 2 03:37:38 2003
+++ linus-2.5/security/root_plug.c Thu Jun 12 00:40:12 2003
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
printk (KERN_INFO "Root Plug module removed\n");
}
-module_init (rootplug_init);
+security_initcall (rootplug_init);
module_exit (rootplug_exit);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Root Plug sample LSM module, written for Linux Journal article");
--- linus-2.5/security/security.c.early_init Wed Dec 18 15:10:17 2002
+++ linus-2.5/security/security.c Thu Jun 12 00:40:12 2003
@@ -38,12 +38,22 @@
return 0;
}
+static void __init do_security_initcalls(void)
+{
+ initcall_t *call;
+ call = &__security_initcall_start;
+ while (call < &__security_initcall_end) {
+ (*call)();
+ call++;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* security_scaffolding_startup - initialzes the security scaffolding framework
*
* This should be called early in the kernel initialization sequence.
*/
-int security_scaffolding_startup (void)
+int __init security_scaffolding_startup (void)
{
printk (KERN_INFO "Security Scaffold v" SECURITY_SCAFFOLD_VERSION
" initialized\n");
@@ -55,6 +65,7 @@
}
security_ops = &dummy_security_ops;
+ do_security_initcalls();
return 0;
}
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-13 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-13 7:10 Chris Wright [this message]
2003-06-13 7:15 ` [PATCH][LSM] Remove task_kmod_set_label hook 2/4 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:19 ` [PATCH][LSM] Remove inode_permission_lite hook 3/4 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:22 ` [PATCH][LSM] setfsuid/setgsuid bug fix 4/4 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:30 ` [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules 1/4 Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030613001021.D31636@figure1.int.wirex.com \
--to=chris@wirex.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox