From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265617AbTFNFQj (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:16:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265618AbTFNFQj (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:16:39 -0400 Received: from bristol.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.130]:34471 "EHLO bristol.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265617AbTFNFQi (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:16:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:28:45 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.4.21 released Message-ID: <20030614042845.GH492@hopper.phunnypharm.org> References: <200306131453.h5DErX47015940@hera.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306131453.h5DErX47015940@hera.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:53:33AM -0700, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > final: > > - 2.4.21-rc8 was released as 2.4.21 with no changes. Could you atleast commit the EXTRAVERSION change and the v2.4.21 tag to BK so that the CVS and subsequent users can be updated? I know it sounds trivial, but some things eventually depend on it. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/