From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262403AbTFORDT (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:03:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262413AbTFORDT (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:03:19 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:60683 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262403AbTFORDO (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:03:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:17:03 +0100 From: Russell King To: David Woodhouse Cc: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic! Message-ID: <20030615181703.H5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel List References: <20030615142950.A32102@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1055697278.1244.19.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1055697278.1244.19.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote: > > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the > > spin_unlocks. 8) > > I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful > of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I > assume that includes your afs partitioning fix? Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due to do another sync up, feel free to include that. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html