public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:51:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306161444090.18129@dns.toxicfilms.tv>

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:47:15 +0200 (CEST)
Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv> wrote:

> > there seems to be a real serious problem with 2.4.21, routing through two
> > ethernet-devices. After 24 hours of a routing-only box the throughput from
> > ethernet a to ethernet b decreased to something around 4-100 kByte/sec (100
> > Mbit network 2 cards ns83820). I had to drop using 2.4.21 on this box
> > because of this. 2.4.20 is flawless on the machine and ran for around 100
> > days before without any troubles. Going back to 2.4.20 cured it.
> Are you using any netfilter patch-o-matic patches?

No.

> Does it also affect eg. ssh latency even on LAN ?

Not very seriously.

> Since I switched my processor from Intel do Amd, I have been experiencing
> similar but after longer periods of time than yours.
> 
> I am also using VIA chipset, maybe it's a hardware driver problem.

No, my two boxes have differing mb's. One is VIA, the other is Intel440BX.

But I can also verify that the problem arises with 2.4.21-rc7, too. I guess it
is effectively an older problem that has not been recognised so far.

> Regards,
> Maciej

Regards,
Stephan


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-16 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-16 12:18 BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-16 12:34 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-23  7:14   ` Michael Knigge
2003-06-23 11:42     ` Alan Cox
2003-06-16 12:47 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-06-16 12:51   ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-06-16 13:10     ` Martin Zwickel
2003-06-16 18:18       ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 19:33         ` BUG: Massive performance drop in conncetion time with 2.4.21 (62KB) Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 20:04           ` David S. Miller
2003-06-18 13:10             ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput " Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-18 14:16               ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-18 17:20               ` David S. Miller
2003-06-19 12:24                 ` Stephan von Krawczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox