From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306161444090.18129@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:47:15 +0200 (CEST)
Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv> wrote:
> > there seems to be a real serious problem with 2.4.21, routing through two
> > ethernet-devices. After 24 hours of a routing-only box the throughput from
> > ethernet a to ethernet b decreased to something around 4-100 kByte/sec (100
> > Mbit network 2 cards ns83820). I had to drop using 2.4.21 on this box
> > because of this. 2.4.20 is flawless on the machine and ran for around 100
> > days before without any troubles. Going back to 2.4.20 cured it.
> Are you using any netfilter patch-o-matic patches?
No.
> Does it also affect eg. ssh latency even on LAN ?
Not very seriously.
> Since I switched my processor from Intel do Amd, I have been experiencing
> similar but after longer periods of time than yours.
>
> I am also using VIA chipset, maybe it's a hardware driver problem.
No, my two boxes have differing mb's. One is VIA, the other is Intel440BX.
But I can also verify that the problem arises with 2.4.21-rc7, too. I guess it
is effectively an older problem that has not been recognised so far.
> Regards,
> Maciej
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-16 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-16 12:18 BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-16 12:34 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-23 7:14 ` Michael Knigge
2003-06-23 11:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-16 12:47 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-06-16 12:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-06-16 13:10 ` Martin Zwickel
2003-06-16 18:18 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 19:33 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in conncetion time with 2.4.21 (62KB) Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 20:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-18 13:10 ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput " Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-18 14:16 ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-18 17:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-19 12:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox