Re: pci_domain_nr vs. /sys/devices

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:49:48PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> I chose to add the domain into dev->slot_name since its needed for matching
> kernel messages to drivers. Im wondering if we should make this conditional
> on pci domain support since it does add some noise for those who couldnt
> care less about domains.

It's also exposed to userspace in some ways I don't think I like.
Here's some of the fun ones:

./sound/oss/emu10k1/main.c:             sprintf(s, "driver/emu10k1/%s", card->pci_dev->slot_name);
./drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c: * pci_dev::slot_name (8 characters) for the PCI device (if any).
(oops, that one already changed to use the device->bus_id, so that broke ...)

And some potential buffer overruns:
./drivers/input/gameport/cs461x.c:      sprintf(phys, "pci%s/gameport0", pdev->slot_name);
./drivers/net/3c59x.c:                  strcpy(info.bus_info, VORTEX_PCI(vp)->slot_name);

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk