From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI device list locking - take 2
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:33:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030618153324.A20212@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030618212921.GA1807@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:29:21PM -0700
* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote:
> static void *pci_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> - struct list_head *p = &pci_devices;
> + struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> loff_t n = *pos;
>
> - /* XXX: surely we need some locking for traversing the list? */
> + dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev);
> while (n--) {
> - p = p->next;
> - if (p == &pci_devices)
> - return NULL;
> + dev = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, dev);
> + if (dev == NULL)
> + goto exit;
I think this still has the same problem. pci_get_device grabs lock,
walks list, gets ref, and drops lock. But the ref doesn't hold it on the
list, right?. So some pci_remove_* could do list_del(&dev->global_list),
poison the prev/next pointers. Subsequent pci_get_device would do ->next
and oops. It seems the lock needs to be held for entire start/next/stop
sequence, or the ref needs to keep it on list.
> +struct pci_dev *
> +pci_get_subsys(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
<snip>
> +exit:
> + if (from)
> + pci_put_dev(from);
> + if (dev)
> + pci_get_dev(dev);
Heh, the hch in me notes that pci_{put,get}_dev already check NULL device ;-)
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-18 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-18 21:29 [RFC] PCI device list locking - take 2 Greg KH
2003-06-18 22:33 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2003-06-18 22:46 ` Greg KH
2003-06-18 23:32 ` Chris Wright
2003-06-18 23:52 ` Greg KH
2003-06-19 0:20 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030618153324.A20212@figure1.int.wirex.com \
--to=chris@wirex.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox