From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:11:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030622001101.GB10801@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306211652130.1980-100000@home.transmeta.com>
Em Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:53:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Meanwhile, let's do this:
>
> I'd prefer the C99 thing, ie
>
> for (int i = xxx ...)
>
> syntax. I know gcc-3.x supports it, maybe 2.96 does too? If so, we could
> just add "-std=c99" or whatever, and start using that.
Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good stuff
like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff could be done in
an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm
if gcc 2.96 accepts this?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-21 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 18:36 [PATCH] Isapnp warning Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-21 14:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 15:04 ` Sean Neakums
2003-06-21 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-21 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 0:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-06-22 1:41 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 1:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-06-22 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 2:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 2:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
2003-06-22 3:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-22 4:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-22 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-22 13:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 5:39 ` gcc 3.3: largest *and* smallest kernels (was Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning) Barry K. Nathan
2003-06-22 11:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-22 13:22 ` GCC speed (was " Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 17:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 18:58 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-22 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 19:32 ` Henning Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-23 1:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-01-04 11:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-17 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-17 10:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-17 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-22 8:49 ` [PATCH] Isapnp warning Russell King
2003-06-22 8:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-22 14:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 15:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-29 14:49 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-15 19:10 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-09 10:37 Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030622001101.GB10801@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox