From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.73-mm1 with contest
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:45:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306260945.46212.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
Recent contest benchmarks to compare with 2.5.73-mm1
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.72-mm1 1 78 93.6 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.72-mm2 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.73-mm1 1 77 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.72-mm1 1 74 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.72-mm2 1 75 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.73-mm1 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 107 70.1 65.0 28.7 1.35
2.5.72-mm1 2 107 68.2 65.0 29.0 1.37
2.5.72-mm2 2 108 67.6 66.5 28.7 1.40
2.5.73-mm1 2 108 67.6 67.0 29.6 1.40
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 3 103 75.7 0.0 0.0 1.30
2.5.72-mm1 3 107 72.0 0.7 3.7 1.37
2.5.72-mm2 3 105 73.3 1.0 5.7 1.36
2.5.73-mm1 3 103 74.8 0.0 0.0 1.34
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 3 104 74.0 1.0 3.8 1.32
2.5.72-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.45
2.5.72-mm2 3 118 63.6 2.0 4.2 1.53
2.5.73-mm1 3 113 66.4 2.0 4.4 1.47
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 4 356 21.9 128.9 19.3 4.51
2.5.72-mm1 4 122 62.3 43.8 18.7 1.56
2.5.72-mm2 4 119 63.0 44.1 20.0 1.55
2.5.73-mm1 4 127 59.1 39.7 16.5 1.65
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 120 65.0 51.2 23.0 1.52
2.5.72-mm1 2 112 67.9 44.5 19.5 1.44
2.5.72-mm2 2 111 68.5 44.6 19.6 1.44
2.5.73-mm1 2 112 67.9 43.0 19.6 1.45
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 104 75.0 6.3 4.8 1.32
2.5.72-mm1 2 104 74.0 7.7 6.7 1.33
2.5.72-mm2 2 106 71.7 7.7 8.5 1.38
2.5.73-mm1 2 100 76.0 7.8 7.0 1.30
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 97 79.4 0.0 7.2 1.23
2.5.72-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 6.5 1.19
2.5.72-mm2 2 93 80.6 0.0 5.4 1.21
2.5.73-mm1 2 93 80.6 0.0 7.5 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 2 95 82.1 54.0 2.1 1.20
2.5.72-mm1 2 111 69.4 53.5 1.8 1.42
2.5.72-mm2 2 111 69.4 53.5 1.8 1.44
2.5.73-mm1 2 114 68.4 54.0 1.8 1.48
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.72 4 397 19.6 5.5 50.4 5.03
2.5.72-mm1 4 333 22.5 4.2 44.7 4.27
2.5.72-mm2 4 328 22.6 4.5 48.0 4.26
2.5.73-mm1 4 365 20.8 5.0 48.2 4.74
Small differences only.
...so to answer your question Andrew, I don't see anything really showing up
in this benchmark.
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-06-25 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306260945.46212.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox