From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264434AbTF0Ppk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:45:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264455AbTF0Ppk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:45:40 -0400 Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.43]:52952 "EHLO mail-in-03.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264434AbTF0Ppj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:45:39 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC] My research agenda for 2.7 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:00:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <200306250111.01498.phillips@arcor.de> <200306271750.52362.phillips@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <200306271750.52362.phillips@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306271800.53487.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 June 2003 17:50, Daniel Phillips wrote: > You might want to have a look at this: > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/vmalloc/ > (Vmalloc: A Memory Allocation Library) Whoops, I retract that. I did a quick scan of the page and ran into a link labled "Non-Commercial License Agreement and Software", attached to some form of license loaded with ugly patent words and so on. My immediate reaction is: stay far, far away from that work, it is encumbered. It would be nice if somebody knows differently, but for now I must ignore Vo's work. Regards, Daniel