From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: patch-O1int-0306281420 for 2.5.73 interactivity
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 23:38:14 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306302337.51171.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030630133424.00cfe800@pop.gmx.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 742 bytes --]
>At 11:39 AM 6/30/2003 +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>>Please, can we invite Ingo to this thread? I think it is now _really_ the
>>time
>>to get this fixed up :)
>
>The giants all seem to be busy... are munchkins stackable? ;-)
Ok this munchkin has some more to contribute.
Here is the next patch which shows a large improvement. Gone is the
unnecessary exponential function (sorry Pat it was fun), and now the patch
will start calculating interactivity from the first time an application is
activated.
This takes away the X jerkiness evident in the previous patches (yes I do
believe you MCP). No granularity patch is needed either.
Please test the bejeesus out of this one; MCP your test case is the most
valuable.
Con
[-- Attachment #2: patch-O1int-0306302317 --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3532 bytes --]
--- linux-2.5.73/kernel/sched.c 2003-06-30 10:06:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.73-test/kernel/sched.c 2003-06-30 23:16:42.000000000 +1000
@@ -314,11 +314,23 @@ static inline void enqueue_task(struct t
static int effective_prio(task_t *p)
{
int bonus, prio;
+ long sleep_period;
if (rt_task(p))
return p->prio;
- bonus = MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO*p->sleep_avg/MAX_SLEEP_AVG/100 -
+ sleep_period = jiffies - p->avg_start;
+
+ if (!sleep_period)
+ return p->static_prio;
+
+ if (sleep_period > MAX_SLEEP_AVG)
+ sleep_period = MAX_SLEEP_AVG;
+
+ if (p->sleep_avg > sleep_period)
+ sleep_period = p->sleep_avg;
+
+ bonus = MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO*p->sleep_avg/sleep_period/100 -
MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO/100/2;
prio = p->static_prio - bonus;
@@ -348,9 +360,19 @@ static inline void activate_task(task_t
{
long sleep_time = jiffies - p->last_run - 1;
- if (sleep_time > 0) {
- int sleep_avg;
+ if (p->avg_start == 0){
+ p->avg_start = jiffies;
+ p->sleep_avg = 0;
+ sleep_time = 0;
+ }
+ if (sleep_time >= 0) {
+
+ if (sleep_time > HZ){
+ p->avg_start = jiffies;
+ p->sleep_avg = 0;
+ }
+ else {
/*
* This code gives a bonus to interactive tasks.
*
@@ -359,7 +381,7 @@ static inline void activate_task(task_t
* spends sleeping, the higher the average gets - and the
* higher the priority boost gets as well.
*/
- sleep_avg = p->sleep_avg + sleep_time;
+ p->sleep_avg += sleep_time;
/*
* 'Overflow' bonus ticks go to the waker as well, so the
@@ -367,12 +389,14 @@ static inline void activate_task(task_t
* boosting tasks that are related to maximum-interactive
* tasks.
*/
- if (sleep_avg > MAX_SLEEP_AVG)
- sleep_avg = MAX_SLEEP_AVG;
- if (p->sleep_avg != sleep_avg) {
- p->sleep_avg = sleep_avg;
- p->prio = effective_prio(p);
+ if (p->sleep_avg > MAX_SLEEP_AVG * 12/10)
+ p->sleep_avg = MAX_SLEEP_AVG * 11/10;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(p->avg_start > jiffies)){
+ p->avg_start = jiffies;
+ p->sleep_avg = 0;
}
+ p->prio = effective_prio(p);
}
__activate_task(p, rq);
}
@@ -549,8 +573,6 @@ void wake_up_forked_process(task_t * p)
* and children as well, to keep max-interactive tasks
* from forking tasks that are max-interactive.
*/
- current->sleep_avg = current->sleep_avg * PARENT_PENALTY / 100;
- p->sleep_avg = p->sleep_avg * CHILD_PENALTY / 100;
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
@@ -586,13 +608,6 @@ void sched_exit(task_t * p)
p->parent->time_slice = MAX_TIMESLICE;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
- /*
- * If the child was a (relative-) CPU hog then decrease
- * the sleep_avg of the parent as well.
- */
- if (p->sleep_avg < p->parent->sleep_avg)
- p->parent->sleep_avg = (p->parent->sleep_avg * EXIT_WEIGHT +
- p->sleep_avg) / (EXIT_WEIGHT + 1);
}
/**
--- linux-2.5.73/kernel/fork.c 2003-06-30 10:06:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.73-test/kernel/fork.c 2003-06-30 23:06:26.000000000 +1000
@@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigne
p->array = NULL;
p->lock_depth = -1; /* -1 = no lock */
p->start_time = get_jiffies_64();
+ p->avg_start = 0;
p->security = NULL;
retval = -ENOMEM;
--- linux-2.5.73/include/linux/sched.h 2003-06-30 10:06:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.73-test/include/linux/sched.h 2003-06-30 13:23:46.000000000 +1000
@@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ struct task_struct {
prio_array_t *array;
unsigned long sleep_avg;
+ unsigned long avg_start;
unsigned long last_run;
unsigned long policy;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-30 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-28 5:16 patch-O1int-0306281420 for 2.5.73 interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-06-28 16:30 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-28 17:22 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-06-29 1:25 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-28 18:22 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-06-28 18:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-06-28 20:26 ` pat erley
2003-06-28 22:45 ` Roberto Orenstein
2003-06-29 1:32 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-29 4:57 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 5:35 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 7:49 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-30 7:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-06-30 10:16 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 10:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-06-30 9:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-06-30 9:39 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-30 9:47 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-30 10:10 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-30 10:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-30 21:05 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-30 12:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-06-30 13:38 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-06-30 21:09 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-06-30 18:46 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306302337.51171.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox