From: Luis Miguel Garcia <ktech@wanadoo.es>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Johoho <johoho@hojo-net.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O1int 0307010922 for 2.5.73 interactivity
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:56:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030701125612.28ea5be0.ktech@wanadoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030701105157.GB689@gmx.de>
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:51:57 +0200
Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 01:32:41PM +0200, Luis Miguel Garcia wrote:
> > With the first one, only throughput is important and in the second one, we can take in all the stuff to improve the interactivity (preempt, 01int, granularity) so we can give more agresive interactivity to the Desktop Kernel.
> >
> > Is this a sillyness?
>
> placing this in /proc would be a better idea. The more I watch the whole
> interactivity debate I think that there is no golden way for server and desktop machines.
This is for what I have said that. Sometimes the people says. "This is good for Desktop, but drops the performance / throughput 20%". Perhaps some people prefer having a true multimedia desktop without skips in the music and video, and less throughput (like i prefer).
But let Con do it's best. I think he knows what is doing ;)
Thanks Con and others!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-01 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-01 11:32 [PATCH] O1int 0307010922 for 2.5.73 interactivity Luis Miguel Garcia
2003-07-01 10:48 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 10:51 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-01 10:56 ` Luis Miguel Garcia [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-30 23:44 Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 23:52 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 1:04 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-07-01 1:58 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-07-01 2:10 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 4:41 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-07-01 6:07 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 10:12 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-01 10:32 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030701125612.28ea5be0.ktech@wanadoo.es \
--to=ktech@wanadoo.es \
--cc=johoho@hojo-net.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox