From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] patch-O1int-0306302317 for 2.5.73 interactivity
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:31:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307011931.24586.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1057049984.587.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:59, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 23:54, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 07:21, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 16:29, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Buried deep in another mail thread was the latest implementation of
> > > > my O1int patch so I've brought it to the surface to make it clear
> > > > this one is significantly different from past iterations.
> > > >
> > > > Summary:
> > > > Decreases audio skipping with loads.
> > > > Smooths out X performance with load.
> > > >
> > > > I've also made it available here:
> > > > http://kernel.kolivas.org/2.5
> > > >
> > > > along with a patch called granularity that is a modified version of
> > > > Ingo's timeslice_granularity patch. It is no longer necessary and may
> > > > slightly decrease throughput in non-desktop settings but put on top
> > > > of my O1int patch makes X even smoother.
> > >
> > > Damn! XMMS audio skips are back... To reproduce them, I start up my KDE
> > > session, launch Konqueror, launch XMMS and make it play sound. Then, I
> > > drag the Konqueror window like crazy over my desktop and XMMS skips,
> > > altough not too much.
> > >
> > > The previous version of this patch is the one that worked best for me.
> >
> > A little bit more of this.. a little bit less of that... Use 100 or
> > 1000Hz for this one? And did you notice any change in X?
>
> I'm using 1000HZ. With respect to X, I haven't noticed any major
> difference. Should I? I haven't tested it under very heavy loads, but
> under normal workloads, it behaves a little better than its predecesors.
I'd say it would depend on the graphic card. On a sis630 even with a p3 1133
it is embarassingly jerky under even the slightest of loads without my patch.
However, it is as good now without the granularity patch as earlier with the
granularity.
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-01 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-30 14:29 [PATCH] patch-O1int-0306302317 for 2.5.73 interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 18:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-06-30 22:50 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 21:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-06-30 21:54 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 8:59 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-01 9:31 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-07-01 12:00 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-01 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 13:17 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-01 13:29 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 16:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-06-30 22:03 ` Wiktor Wodecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307011931.24586.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox