public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Readd BUG for SMP TLB IPI
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:32:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030709193246.059ee57d.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1057770255.6255.70.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On 09 Jul 2003 18:04:15 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mer, 2003-07-09 at 17:58, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > It can happen to any PII/PIII box, its just very very rare on others, so
> > > rare I guess such crashes are in the noise.
> > 
> > How do you know it an happen on them? Do you have backtraces?
> 
> I sat down with a BP6 owner and did lots of debugging.

I meant on the not known-to-be-nearly-unusable boards. Or are you saying that
on the other boards the APIC bus could be lossy too, but it's very unlikely? 

[my personal feeling would be to consider the lossy APIC bus to be a hardware
problem, like an MCE that cannot be really handled] 

> > If the BUG was there they wouldn't be in the noise.  With the incomplete/broken
> > handling it's just a silent hang.
> 
> I'm not arguing BUG is better than hang, but working right is better than BUG 8)

I suspect when you have a lossy APIC bug you will run into problems with other IPIs too,
it's really an uphill fight which you are likely to lose.

Anyways, having a clear BUG will make it easier to evaluate if there is really
a problem.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-09 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-09 10:49 [PATCH] Readd BUG for SMP TLB IPI Andi Kleen
2003-07-09 11:27 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-09 11:41   ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-09 16:53     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-09 16:58       ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-09 17:04         ` Alan Cox
2003-07-09 17:32           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2003-07-09 23:38             ` Alan Cox
2003-07-09 17:37           ` Compile failure 2.4.22-pre3-ac1 Midian
2003-07-09 18:10             ` Steven Cole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030709193246.059ee57d.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox