public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
To: Milan Roubal <roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mru@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Promise SATA 150 TX2 plus
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 08:35:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030710063516.GA3357@citd.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03ab01c34677$225d53a0$401a71c3@izidor>

On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:06:38AM +0200, Milan Roubal wrote:
> Wow, how is the performance of this cards? HPT PATA controllers
> was always bad in performance and if it has got SATA to PATA converter,
> I can't imagine how fast/slow it could be.

For me performance is good.

I don't use it in a RAID configuration but with 4 seperate WD 100GB
HDDs.

Linear througput is 40MB/s (=maximum of this HDD). And when i copy a
file from one of the HDDs to another, the total thoughput is 70MB/s.

I used the same HDDs with a Promise Ultra 100 TX2 before and the
throughput is a bit (i'd say about 5%) better now.

MB: Tyan Thunder HE-SL (Serverworks HE-SL Chipset)
CPU: 2xPIII 933Mhz
The Highpoint is the only connected device to the 66MHz PCI-Bus.

> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 04:51:13PM +0200, Milan Roubal wrote:
> > > So other question - is there SATA controler that
> > > is working in linux multiple controlers (4 cards)
> > > and is for better bus than standart PCI? Like PCI-X or
> > > PCI 66 MHz like promise is?
> > 
> > Highpoint RocketRAID 1540 or 1542.
> > (www.highpoint-tech.com)
> > 
> > OK, it's not native SATA but a PATA with converters, but at least for me
> > that a none-issue.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Bis denn

-- 




Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-10  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-09 13:16 Promise SATA 150 TX2 plus Mitch
2003-07-09 13:34 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 14:11   ` mru
2003-07-09 14:51     ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 17:58       ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-07-10  0:06         ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10  0:20           ` Alan Cox
2003-07-10  0:37             ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10  6:35           ` Matthias Schniedermeyer [this message]
2003-07-09 18:22       ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-09 23:54         ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10  0:15           ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10  0:30             ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-10  0:50               ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10  2:36                 ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 15:08     ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-09 15:19       ` mru
2003-07-09 16:16         ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-10  0:08         ` Milan Roubal
2003-07-09 19:56   ` Marcel J.E. Mol
2003-07-09 23:48     ` Milan Roubal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-09 12:57 Milan Roubal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030710063516.GA3357@citd.de \
    --to=ms@citd.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=roubm9am@barbora.ms.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox