public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm3 OOM killer fubared ?
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:38:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030710103810.1276def5.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bejhrj$dgg$1@news.cistron.nl>

"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl> wrote:
>
> I was running 2.5.74 on our newsfeeder box for a day without
> problems (and 2.5.72-mm2 for weeks before that).

And how was 2.5.72-mm2 performing, generally?

> Now with 2.5.74-mm3 (booted 11 hours ago) it keeps killing processes
> for no apparent reason:
> ...
> I notice that in -mm3 this was deleted relative to -vanilla:
> 
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Enough swap space left?  Not OOM.
> -        */
> -       if (nr_swap_pages > 0)
> -               return;
>   
> .. is that what causes this?

Yes.  That was a "hmm, I wonder what happens if I do this" patch.  It's
interesting that we're going down that code path.

Is your INND configured to use the strange mmap(MAP_SHARED) of a blockdev
thing?   That could explain the scanning hysteria.

> Related mm question - this box is a news server, which does a lot
> of streaming I/O, and also keeps a history database open. I have the
> idea that the streaming I/O evicts the history database hash and
> index file caches from memory, which I do not want. Any chance of
> a control on a filedescriptor that tells it how persistant to be
> in caching file data ? E.g. a sort of "nice" for the cache, so that
> I could say that streaming data may be flushed from buffers/cache
> earlier than other data (where the other data would be the
> database files) ?

Makes sense.  We can use posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE) as a hint to
tell the VM/VFS to throw away old pages.  I'll take a look at that.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-10 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-10 11:14 2.5.74-mm3 OOM killer fubared ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-10 11:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-10 12:54   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-10 13:34     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-10 13:45       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-10 14:32       ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-10 17:43         ` Mikulas Patocka
2003-07-10 15:56     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-10 23:05       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-11  1:01         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-10 17:38 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-07-10 23:31   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-07-10 17:46 ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030710103810.1276def5.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox