* Strange BK behaviour?
@ 2003-07-11 20:21 Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-11 20:55 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2003-07-11 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy, lkml
Hi,
I just tagged v2.4.22-pre5 after pulling jgarzik's 2.4 net-drivers tree.
I cant seem to able able to push that tag to bkbits.net, though.
bkpush returns me:
Nothing to send to bk://linux@linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.4
Locally, I have:
ChangeSet@1.1079, 2003-07-11 16:11:39-03:00,
marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva
Merge bk://kernel.bkbits.net/jgarzik/net-drivers-2.4
into freak.distro.conectiva:/home/marcelo/bk/linux-2.4
TAG: v2.4.22-pre5
Now going to the web interface shows the net-drivers-2.4 merge, but not
the TAG on it.
Whats going on?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange BK behaviour?
2003-07-11 20:21 Strange BK behaviour? Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2003-07-11 20:55 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-11 19:54 ` Ben Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-07-11 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: Larry McVoy, lkml
Ahh, it's there, bkbits just isn't showing it because it is an empty merge
changeset. That's a bug. If you care, file a bug on bk/web with a
summary like "show merge changesets if they are tagged".
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange BK behaviour?
2003-07-11 20:55 ` Larry McVoy
@ 2003-07-11 19:54 ` Ben Collins
2003-07-11 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Collins @ 2003-07-11 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry McVoy, Marcelo Tosatti, Larry McVoy, lkml
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:55:32PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Ahh, it's there, bkbits just isn't showing it because it is an empty merge
> changeset. That's a bug. If you care, file a bug on bk/web with a
> summary like "show merge changesets if they are tagged".
It definitely got down to CVS/SVN.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Strange BK behaviour?
2003-07-11 19:54 ` Ben Collins
@ 2003-07-11 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2003-07-11 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Collins; +Cc: Larry McVoy, Marcelo Tosatti, lkml
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:54:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:55:32PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > Ahh, it's there, bkbits just isn't showing it because it is an empty merge
> > changeset. That's a bug. If you care, file a bug on bk/web with a
> > summary like "show merge changesets if they are tagged".
>
> It definitely got down to CVS/SVN.
Right, the data is there. There is a lot of "merge noise" in BK where BK
is just recording the fact that changes in unrelated files have been
brought together. In general, you don't want to see all that noise, it's
more or less internal BK metadata. So BK/Web filters it out, as does
bk changes. But in this case, because the cset in question is "named"
with a tag it should have been shown.
It's a presentation issue, not a data problem, which is why CVS/SVN saw
it - the exporter works on the raw data.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-11 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-11 20:21 Strange BK behaviour? Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-11 20:55 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-11 19:54 ` Ben Collins
2003-07-11 21:26 ` Larry McVoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox