From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271427AbTGQMUX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:20:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271413AbTGQMUX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:20:23 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:38845 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271441AbTGQMUT (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:20:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:35:14 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Rory Browne Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK Licence: Protocols and Research Message-ID: <20030717123514.GP833@suse.de> References: <20030717120505.GA22304@zion.nuigalway.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030717120505.GA22304@zion.nuigalway.ie> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 17 2003, Rory Browne wrote: > Hi > > I don't mean to start/restart/prolong a flame war about Bitkepper, but, > I have a few things I'd like to have clarified. Then keep it away from lkml? Why does everybody think that BK discussions belong here?! News flash: they don't! -- Jens Axboe