From: Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com>
To: davem@redhat.com, gsf@research.att.com
Cc: dgk@research.att.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: kernel bug in socketpair()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307231814.OAA74344@raptor.research.att.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030723103135.3eac4cd2.davem@redhat.com
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:31:35 -0700 David S. Miller wrote:
> Interesting.
> I looked at the bash code, and it uses pipes with /dev/fd/N, and for
> /dev/fd/N which are pipes the open should work under Linux.
> This is what David Korn said in his original report.
> I guess the part that is left is the fchmod() issue which exists
> because one inode is used to implement both sides of the pipe under
> Linux.
> Was the idea to, since fchmod() on pipes modified both sides,
> to use UNIX domain sockets to implement this? And that's how
> you discovered the /dev/fd/N failure for sockets?
fchmod() came into play with socketpair() to get the fd modes to match
pipe(); its not needed with pipe()
we use socketpair() to allow efficient peeking on pipe input (via recv()),
where peek means "read some data but don't advance the read/seek offset"
btw, this is on systems that don't allow ioctl(I_PEEK) on pipe() fds;
if there is a way to peek pipe() data on linux then we can switch back
to pipe() and be on our way
> Another idea is to use named unix sockets. Can that be
> sufficient to solve your dilemma?
named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-23 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 14:28 Re: kernel bug in socketpair() David Korn
2003-07-23 14:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 16:56 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 17:24 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:31 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:14 ` Glenn Fowler [this message]
2003-07-23 18:23 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:54 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:11 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:29 ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:56 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 22:24 ` jw schultz
2003-07-23 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 19:41 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-07-23 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 23:27 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-23 13:32 David Korn
2003-07-23 14:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 14:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 15:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 16:13 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200307231814.OAA74344@raptor.research.att.com \
--to=gsf@research.att.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dgk@research.att.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox