From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>
Subject: e1000 performance
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:28:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030728222853.GA2446@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
Hi.
I think I am getting weird performace with e1000 in 2.4.22-pre.
NetPipe gives this numbers for e1000:
Node receiver...
Master transmitter...
Latency: 0.000040
Now starting main loop
0: 4096 bytes 7 times --> 264.18 Mbps in 0.000118 sec
1: 8192 bytes 7 times --> 397.55 Mbps in 0.000157 sec
2: 12288 bytes 795 times --> 475.30 Mbps in 0.000197 sec
3: 16384 bytes 845 times --> 524.12 Mbps in 0.000238 sec
4: 20480 bytes 786 times --> 566.84 Mbps in 0.000276 sec
5: 24576 bytes 725 times --> 586.49 Mbps in 0.000320 sec
6: 28672 bytes 651 times --> 605.81 Mbps in 0.000361 sec
7: 32768 bytes 593 times --> 618.25 Mbps in 0.000404 sec
8: 36864 bytes 540 times --> 579.82 Mbps in 0.000485 sec
9: 40960 bytes 458 times --> 579.72 Mbps in 0.000539 sec
10: 45056 bytes 417 times --> 565.82 Mbps in 0.000608 sec
11: 49152 bytes 374 times --> 569.07 Mbps in 0.000659 sec
12: 53248 bytes 347 times --> 576.62 Mbps in 0.000705 sec
13: 57344 bytes 327 times --> 584.06 Mbps in 0.000749 sec
14: 61440 bytes 309 times --> 587.31 Mbps in 0.000798 sec
15: 65536 bytes 292 times --> 592.25 Mbps in 0.000844 sec
16: 69632 bytes 277 times --> 577.42 Mbps in 0.000920 sec
17: 73728 bytes 255 times --> 566.39 Mbps in 0.000993 sec
18: 77824 bytes 237 times -->
Hardware:
03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82543GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 02)
Kernel is 2.4.22-pre8, patch for MMX/SSE checksums applied:
Measuring network checksumming speed
basic : 768.000 MB/sec
simple : 665.600 MB/sec
func 3Dnow! skipped: not supported by CPU
func AMD-MMX skipped: not supported by CPU
SSE1+ : 819.200 MB/sec
csum: using csum function: SSE1+
basic : 537.600 MB/sec
simple : 537.600 MB/sec
func AMD-MMX skipped: not supported by CPU
SSE1+ : 588.800 MB/sec
SSE1 : 691.200 MB/sec
csum: using csum_copy function: SSE1
No modules parameters for e1000 (default behaviour), no mtu changes, nothing.
Any ideas to up performance ?
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.22-pre8-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.6mdk))
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-28 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-28 22:28 J.A. Magallon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-30 6:52 e1000 performance Feldman, Scott
2003-07-30 22:28 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-07-30 22:55 Feldman, Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030728222853.GA2446@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox